The Space Force wants radio terminals small enough and tough enough to keep satellites and ground stations talking while an adversary jams the link, and it has brought in BAE Systems to prove the hardware can be built. Space Systems Command awarded the company a contract to design and demonstrate ultra-compact radio-frequency terminals for a space-based data layer, BAE said in an Oct. 15, 2026 announcement. The release does not disclose a contract value, a period of performance or the number of terminals involved.

The work starts as a design-and-demonstrate effort, not a production buy. BAE also says it is positioning the system for scalable production to meet future Department of War needs, which signals where the company hopes the demonstration leads.

What BAE Will Put Inside the Ultra-Compact RF Terminals

BAE is not starting from a blank sheet. According to the company, it will provide a solution based on "its proven, space-hardened family of software-defined radios." A software-defined radio handles much of its signal processing in reconfigurable software and firmware rather than in fixed analog circuits, which lets an operator change waveforms or behavior without swapping hardware.

The company framed the radios' value around survivability. "These radios ensure reliable performance in contested or degraded environments such as jamming electromagnetic interference and space radiation from deployment into various orbits," BAE said in its statement, a line Defense Daily also quoted in its Oct. 16 coverage.

The release lists three requirements the system must meet:

  • "robust, military-grade security"
  • passing space-characterization tests
  • supporting operations from low Earth orbit (LEO) to geosynchronous Earth orbit (GEO)

That orbital span matters. A terminal that works only in one regime limits which spacecraft can carry it; one qualified across LEO through GEO could, in principle, ride on a much wider range of buses and missions. BAE did not say which specific orbits the demonstration will cover first.

How an API Will Handle Pointing Between Payloads

One detail in the announcement points to how the terminals will plug into other hardware. BAE said it "will work with its government partners to rapidly field and demonstrate this critical technology using an Application Programming Interface (API) to enable precise pointing between payloads."

Pointing is the job of aiming a link at its counterpart, whether another satellite or a ground station. Exposing that control through a defined software interface, rather than burying it in a proprietary design, would let other payloads and systems direct the terminal. The release does not describe the API's specification, who owns it, or whether the government will publish it to other vendors.

Defense Daily's account adds one point the press release leaves implicit: the terminals are intended for use "on spacecraft and ground stations for datalink communications." In other words, the effort covers both ends of the link, not only the space segment.

Why BAE Cites Its Apollo-Era Heritage

BAE leaned on its history with radiation-hardened electronics to explain why it won the work. "This contract leverages decades of experience delivering mission-critical, radiation-hardened hardware and communications systems – from Apollo-era programs to today's deep-space and airborne missions," said Joe Dziezynski, BAE Systems Space Systems product line director.

Advertisement

Dziezynski tied that experience to the company's factory capacity. "Our resilient design and established manufacturing capacity will enable rapid deployment and scalable production, supporting the Space Force's vital mission to enhance global security," he said.

The emphasis on manufacturing capacity is deliberate. A demonstration contract proves a design works; the follow-on question for any buyer is whether the supplier can build the item in volume, on schedule. BAE is already making that case in its announcement of a design-and-demonstrate award.

What the Announcement Leaves Out

The public record on this award is thin. Neither the BAE release nor the readable portion of Defense Daily's report, the rest of which sits behind a subscriber wall, states:

  • the contract's dollar value or type
  • how many terminals BAE will build for the demonstration
  • the schedule or completion date for the demonstration
  • which specific Space Force program or constellation the "space-based data layer" refers to
  • whether other companies received parallel awards for the same effort

Those gaps matter for competitors trying to read the market. A sole demonstration award and one of several parallel awards point to very different paths for a later production competition. Contractors tracking the effort should watch for a Space Systems Command announcement or a contract action that fills in the value and vehicle.

What It Means for Contractors

For companies in the space communications supply chain, the award carries several signals.

Resilience is the selling point. In the language BAE published, the emphasis falls on a terminal that keeps working through jamming, electromagnetic interference and radiation, not on cost or speed. Firms bidding on related work should expect evaluators to press hard on how their products perform in contested and degraded conditions, backed by test data.

Size looks like a requirement, not a preference. The word "ultra-compact" sits in the contract's stated purpose. Suppliers of RF components, power electronics and radiation-tolerant processors that shrink size, weight and power are well placed to sell into prime contractors chasing this class of work.

Software interfaces are part of the product. The API for payload-to-payload pointing suggests the government wants terminals that other systems can command through a defined interface. Software and integration firms with experience in pointing, acquisition and tracking, or in ground-segment control, may find subcontract openings as primes build and test those interfaces.

Production planning starts early. BAE is already talking about scalable production for future Department of War needs. Rivals that want a shot at any follow-on buy will need to show manufacturing capacity, not only a working prototype.

Watch for the missing numbers. Until the value, quantities and program name surface, smaller firms cannot size the opportunity. Monitoring Space Systems Command announcements and federal contract award data for this action is the practical next step.

Sources