The Department of Veterans Affairs has published a proposed rule that would strip disparate-impact liability from its Title VI civil rights regulations, replacing it with a standard that requires proof of intentional discrimination before VA-assisted programs can be found in violation.

Background

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs that receive federal financial assistance. For decades, VA's implementing regulations at 38 CFR Part 18 allowed enforcement not only against intentional discrimination but also against policies that produced a discriminatory effect, regardless of intent, under the disparate-impact framework courts and agencies developed to interpret Title VI and its regulations. The proposed rule, published June 26, 2026, as 91 FR 38569–38576 (FR Doc. 2026-12924), reverses that approach. VA states the change aligns Title VI enforcement with the statute's "original public meaning," which the agency argues supports only an intentional-discrimination standard, and that the shift avoids what VA describes as constitutional concerns raised by disparate-impact liability. VA Secretary Douglas A. Collins personally approved the proposed rule on June 22, 2026, four days before Federal Register publication. The rule implements Executive Order 14281, "Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy," which President Trump signed in April 2025 directing all federal agencies to eliminate disparate-impact liability "to the maximum degree possible" in their own regulations and enforcement practices. VA is not the first agency to act on that directive. The Department of Justice finalized a comparable rollback of its own Title VI disparate-impact provisions in December 2025, and the Department of Transportation published a parallel rule on June 11, 2026, at 91 FR 35424, rescinding portions of its Title VI regulations to conform to the executive order. VA's proposal extends the same policy shift to the programs it funds, including medical facilities, state veterans' homes, and construction and services grantees that receive VA federal financial assistance. Disparate-impact enforcement under Title VI has long rested on agency regulations rather than the statute's text alone. The Supreme Court held in Alexander v. Sandoval that Title VI itself does not create a private right of action for disparate-impact claims, leaving agencies as the primary enforcers of disparate-impact standards through their own implementing regulations. That structure is precisely what VA's proposed rule targets: because VA's authority to pursue disparate-impact findings flows from 38 CFR Part 18 rather than the statute directly, the agency can eliminate that liability by amending its own regulatory text, without needing new legislation from Congress.

Key Details

The proposed rule amends 38 CFR Part 18 to remove language and provisions that VA has used to evaluate whether a federally assisted program's practices produce a discriminatory effect on a protected group, even absent proof that the program intended to discriminate. Under the revised standard, a complainant or VA investigator would instead need to show that a recipient of VA assistance acted with discriminatory intent to establish a Title VI violation. VA frames the change as a cost-saving and clarity measure. The agency's supplementary information accompanying the proposed rule states that an intentional-discrimination-only standard reduces compliance burdens on recipients of VA financial assistance because it removes the need to conduct or defend against statistical and disparate-effect analyses that disparate-impact claims typically require. VA also argues the narrower standard better reflects what Title VI's text actually prohibits, a legal position the agency ties directly to the reasoning behind Executive Order 14281. The proposed rule opened a public comment period running through July 27, 2026. VA has not indicated a target date for a final rule, though the pace of related rulemakings across DOJ, DOT, and now VA suggests agencies are moving through this implementation on a similar multi-month track from proposal to comment close. The proposed rule also changes how VA evaluates Title VI complaints tied to VA-assisted programs. Complaints alleging only a statistical or numerical disparity in outcomes, without an accompanying showing of discriminatory intent, would no longer support a Title VI finding once the rule takes final effect. Complainants would still be able to pursue claims grounded in evidence of intent, consistent with the intentional-discrimination standard VA says the rule restores. The rule sits within a broader wave of agency-by-agency changes stemming from the same executive order. DOJ's December 2025 rule addressed the department's own Title VI regulations, which historically served as a model other agencies used when drafting their versions. DOT's June 11, 2026, rule rescinded portions of its Title VI regulations affecting federally funded transportation programs. VA's proposal follows the same template: cite the executive order, characterize disparate-impact liability as inconsistent with Title VI's original meaning, and replace it with an intent-based standard across the agency's assisted programs.

What It Means for Contractors

Entities that receive VA federal financial assistance face a materially different, and higher, bar for civil rights liability if this rule is finalized as proposed. That group includes medical facilities operating under VA-assisted programs, state veterans' homes, and construction and services grantees whose funding traces back to VA. Under the current disparate-impact framework, these recipients can face Title VI findings based on statistical patterns showing a policy's effect on a protected group, even without evidence the recipient intended that outcome. Under the proposed intentional-discrimination standard, VA and complainants would instead need to demonstrate intent, a substantially harder evidentiary showing. For compliance officers at VA-assisted facilities and grantees, the practical effect is a shift in where legal exposure concentrates. Programs that might have faced scrutiny over statistical disparities in access, staffing, or service delivery would face less exposure on that basis alone, while intentional discrimination claims would remain fully enforceable. Contractors and grantees should not read the proposed rule as eliminating Title VI compliance obligations; VA's nondiscrimination requirements remain in force, and recipients still must avoid intentionally discriminatory practices in any VA-assisted program. Organizations with VA funding relationships have until July 27, 2026, to submit comments on the proposed rule before VA moves toward a final version. Given that DOJ and DOT have already finalized or advanced comparable changes, VA's proposal is unlikely to be an outlier; contractors operating across multiple federally assisted programs should expect the intentional-discrimination standard to become the default across agencies implementing Executive Order 14281, rather than a VA-specific departure.

Sources